It's 2012. What Will You Live Again?

As New Year is upon us, I can't help but reflect back on Slaughterhouse Five (read my review on GoodReads). The book is, in a word, odd, yet it is also very profound.

It is about a man named Billy who is "unstuck in time." This means that he lives his life out of order, jumping ahead and then jumping back again. A few pivotal moments in his life include: serving in WWII, getting married for money, becoming a successful optometrist, being present as a POW for the bombing of Dresden (one of the worst bombings in terms of civilian casualties of WWII), surviving a plane crash, being kidnapped by aliens and placed in a zoo, meeting an author, and so on.

That one about aliens is the one I have reflected on the most. The aliens that kidnap him are called Tralfamadorians. They are unique in that they see, not in the limited 3 dimensions that humans see, but in 4, the 4th dimension being time. Because they can see in time, nothing ever really ceases to exist. They can see, and therefore live in, any moment in the past, present, or future. To them, no one ever really dies because they still exist in the past. It also means that they already know how the universe will end because they can see the future (spoiler alert: a Tralfamadorian test pilot working on a new time/space engine pushes a button and that's it for the universe).

From the beginning, I thought that the concept was pretty interesting, even though it pushed too far into fatalism for me, personally. But the concept I liked the most was how the Tralfamadorians accept the terrible things in life. Because they see/live in the 4th dimension, they can live in any moment they want. So, to avoid falling into terrible depression, they choose to live in their best and happiest moments. They don't live in war, for example, they live in peace.

As the New Year approached and this idea of living in the good times has percolated, I've begun to think about the times that I want to relive this year.

The biggest "good time" was probably when I saw Captain America. It wasn't because the movie was particularly great (though I thought it was very good). It was because we saw it in 3D. The 3D itself wasn't necessarily remarkable, but it was the fact that I could see the movie in 3D that blew me away. I didn't realize, until that moment, just how bad my left eye had gotten prior to the corneal transplant I had back in March. I COULD SEE 3D! It was amazing and well-worth living again, despite the pain that was required to have that experience.

I'd also like to relive our trip to Arizona back in July. The first part, Marcus' wedding, and the last part, the 24th in St. Johns with my family, were awesome. But the part I will remember most will be the 2 days we spent in Jerome and at the Grand Canyon. It was so much fun and brought back so many other good memories. I loved sharing those old experiences with my children, and the aches I felt after we hiked a bit down the trail and back again, and the long, seemingly interminable drive, were totally worth it!

If I get a 3rd choice, I'd also relive the recent power outage caused by a big windstorm (see The Answers Are Blowing' in the Wind). Don't get me wrong, it was a terrible experience—and very, very, cold. And we still haven't fully recovered. But the time we spent together huddled around our fireplace reading A Christmas Carol and roasting hot dogs and telling stories and singing and all of that, was so worth it.

Now that I think about it, the Tralfamadorians are wrong. It really isn't possible to relive the good without the bad because the bad inevitably leads to the good. Or, at the very least, it leads to those moments that are most worth reliving.

I saw a commercial the other day about a car. It said something like, "The only thing better than getting what you wished for, is getting more than what you wished for." I don't buy that. I think that one of the many things better than getting what you wished for is finally achieving something that you had to work and sacrifice and suffer and strive for—something that comes a great, personal cost way beyond a dollar amount. Like going through a painful surgery to be able to see things that you missed before without knowing it, or suffering a couple of very cold nights to spend quality time with loved ones, or barely tolerating a long, difficult drive to share some of you best childhood memories with your children.

So rather than reliving just the good times, I want to relive both the good and the bad because, at least for me, they can't be separated.

What times will you relive?

Sometimes I'm a Bit Clueless

When I was in high school, I often had too much time on my hands. Worse, I had a camera to document it! The below movies were the result of a boring Saturday when 2 friends of I were sitting around with nothing to do. Out of the blue one of us said: "Let's make a movie!" So we grabbed a video camera and pretty much started shooting. Fortunately, we had a lot of good friends who joined in when we asked (and did a pretty good job improving everything then and there). They may regret it now.

So, even though our reputations may never recover, I offer you the complete Clueless Detectives, a movie that stands as a a shining example of why you should never give a video camera to 3 high school boys with nothing better to do on a windy day.

Enjoy!

 

 

For the Love of Bad Movies

I have a confession to make, I love big monster movies. Super 8 was probably my favorite film this year, despite (or maybe because of) its cheesy ending. It surpassed Captain America and Source Code and the other few really good films I watched (in all fairness, there haven't been too many outstanding films this year, but still).

A couple of years ago, my favorite film of the year was Cloverfield, which I have watched more than once since its release. I am also a huge fan of the new King Kong and I own (and love to rematch) the extended, 4-hour version of that film, even though admitting that fact is frowned upon in most of the company I keep. Godzilla (the Roland Emmerich one from 1999) is one of my favorite comedies (yes, you read that right) of all time.

I have also been known to watch and rewatch Sy-Fy original movies, including Raptor Island, quite possibly the worst film ever made, and I really enjoyed Splinter, which is about a, well, a splinter, that turns people into evil, zombie-like monsters (despite its ridiculous-sounding premise, Splinter is actually a decent horror flick with surprisingly good acting and a monster that, believe it or not, is actually scary).

I don't know why I love all these films. I know that all of them are flawed and that many of them are, in fact, terrible, but that doesn't seem to matter. I still enjoy them. For me they are almost the best kind of escapist fantasy, carting me away to a place of pure enjoyment. It's like the old "Calgon take me away," commercials, but instead of a bubble bath, it is adventure-celluloid.

The funny thing is that a lot of people I know also love bad movies of their own. My wife is partial to cheesy Disney Channel movies, complete with the bad acting, silly musical numbers, and everything else that goes along with them. Others are into bad romance movies. I know more than a few who love, beyond anything else, the Twilight movies, which, let's face it, are actually about as bad as movies can be.

There is no rational explanation for any of these guilty pleasures. I have searched my memory for some reason why I like big monster movies, why a film like the atrocious Anaconda makes me all giddy inside, and can't think of a single reason. But that is kind of the point, isn't it? There really doesn't have to be a reason for everything we love and enjoy. It is part of being the emotion-driven creatures that we are. And sometimes I think it is good to just let ourselves enjoy it, no matter how bad it is.

So what bad movies do you like?

The Answers are Blowin' in the Wind

Windstorm, 2011
I love the "blustery day" sequence in the old Winnie-the-Pooh movies/books. It is a great sequence and I love how it ends with Pooh rescuing his best friend—albeit, unknowingly. I grew up in a very windy place where local legend says that the founders stopped there to wait out the wind and, since it never stopped, they built a town (as good an explanation as any), so I could relate to a "Windsday" as Pooh calls it.

I remember a particularly bad windstorm where my brother and I watched our neighbor's shed blow across the street into our yard where it crumpled into a mess of thin sheet metal. The next year he bought another one and I got to watch that one take a trip across the street as well. I also remember taking sheets and catching the wind with them so it would drag us along the ground.

The wind would often blow for weeks at a time. People in my hometown would literally go nuts listening to the gale day-in and day-out day-after-day-after-day. Nobody blamed them.
Good times.

So, when the weathermen predicted a bad windstorm for my new hometown last week, I didn't really think much of it. I mean, it's just wind, right?

On Thursday, we woke up to find our big pine tree knocked over by that wind. The tree missed our house, which was a good thing, and no one was hurt, another very good thing, but it did manage to land on our power lines, knock down a telephone pole, and damage the mast where the power connects to our house.

To make a long, very cold story short, we were without power for a few days and had to huddle in front of our fireplace waiting for the electricians and power company to get everything back in shape.

In the end, we weren't really too bad off. Sure, we got pretty cold (the thermostat read "48" when we could turn the heater back on), but we were all safe and we had a fireplace to help keep us warm, a luxury many of our neighbors didn't have (the entire city was out for nearly 24 hours).
The best part is that the insurance is covering pretty much everything, including the tree removal. Home insurance really sucks... until it doesn't.

The days without power were an interesting experience. We got to appreciate what our forebears must have gone through on a day-to-day basis to settle this area. And the kids got the experience of life without TV or video games or computers or even light in the bathroom. Most of the time, it was kind of fun and the kids started looking at it as an adventure. In fact, after it was all over, Joey told us we could count that for our adventure this month. We just may...

But beyond the adventure, there was something I really liked about the experience: Because the rest of the house was an icebox, all of us huddle in the same room and actually spent time together! I read half of A Christmas Carol to the kids (one of my favorites), they played board games on the floor in front of the fire, we roasted hot dogs and made s'mores, and in general, just spent time together. The kids didn't even really fight much! One particularly fun memory was watching the kids sit around the fire telling scary stories to each other. It was almost sick it was so idyllic!

It made me wonder if it was possible to have that same kind of "together time" without a windstorm knocking out the power or another more drastic disaster. Jenna and I have toyed with the idea of dropping the thermostat a few degrees to make the house colder and then building a fire to "encourage" everyone to gather in the front room. We've talked about turning off the TV and reading to each other a bit more, and other things like that. 

The problem with all of our ideas is that they are easy to say, and I can even see us doing them once in a while, but they are hard to do on any kind of consistent basis. I like my house at a comfortable 68-degrees. And we all like watching movies—a lot. So I wonder how often we will actually be able to do it.

Maybe the song is right and "the answers are blowin' in the wind." Maybe we need wind or something like that to help us remember that we actually like being together and like being a family.

Or maybe the wind has just made me crazy. It wouldn't be the first time.

Looking out from the Dark Side of the Moon

A few nights ago, Jenna and I watched Transformers: Dark Side of the Moon. It was bad. Very bad. I haven't seen one quite that bad in a long time—since Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End.

It's not like any of the Transformers movies have been stellar—nor would I expect them to be. They are based on a cartoon and comic strip which were, in turn, based on a series of toys, after all. So I never had really high expectations for them. I just wanted a good time. And, despite the atrocious scripts, bad acting, ludicrous plot, unnecessary toilet humor, and flat out embarrassing moments, I thought the first one was just that. The second one was more of the same, though it pushed the toilet humor too far and added bad stereotypes and over-the-top, pounding violence on top of all its other flaws. I didn't like second one, but it didn't come close to the third film.

The worst part about Dark Side of the Moon—about the whole series, actually—is that it had potential. The idea behind the script (not the execution) was better than the first two. The acting was better (not stellar, but better), and the toilet humor was much less (though why the Transformers except for Optimus Prime and Bumblebee have to be based on wide-based, often idiotic, almost always insulting stereotypes is beyond me—and why haven't they fixed Bumblebee's vocal processor yet?), and Sam's excruciating parents were mercifully only on screen a few minutes. On top of those improvements, the movie had perhaps the coolest Transformer ever to grace the silver screen (the big worm thing in the trailers) and the advantage of Leonard Nemoy's voice, which brings a bit of class to most everything it's in (yes, even The Simpsons).

So, with all that going for it, how did they screw it up? Well, the biggest problem was the editing, which managed to excise some impressive chunks of information (at least, I assume it was editing because it's hard to believe it was actually written that way). Seriously, it would jump from one sequence to the next with little-to-no rhyme or reason for the jump. It also tried to get viewers invested in characters without really explaining who they were or why we should care when they bit it. In the end, the movie was an even bigger mess than the first two because it didn't make sense and it felt like there were HUGE gaps in the story. While some sequences were interesting, the film was so frustrating that any chance of having fun watching it evaporated by the start of the second act.

But the most frustrating thing about the movie—about all three movies—is that it failed to live up to its potential.

Yes, I know its based on a series of toys and that it was essentially a live-action version of Rock-em Sock-em Robots, so I'm not asking for  Oscar-level  (Heaven help us!). But that isn't an excuse. It's just lazy. And it's too bad, because I was really hoping for a good time.

One Moment of Parenting

It is funny how, as your kids get older, you begin to understand the pain that you put your parents through. This week brought that into sharp focus when the kids brought home their report cards.

For the most part, the report cards were very good, but Joey is failing in one, very important area. It brought back a very bitter memory of my own time in elementary school and I suddenly understood things that didn't entirely make sense to me at the time.

It happened when I was in sixth grade—the year I pretty much wrote off school. That year my teacher was... how to say this politely... not the best for me. He made it too easy for me to skip assignments and space out in class. I'm not blaming him for how I acted that year or for my grades, I'm just saying that his easy-going, hands-off teaching style just made my bad attitude about school worse.

That year I missed a lot of assignments. I think it was somewhere around half in some subject areas that I thought were stupid. My grades, which, until 5th grade, had been pretty good, dropped dramatically. But until 6th grade I'd always managed to pull off mostly Bs and Cs with the minimal effort I put into my school work. In 6th grade, I all but stopped trying and my grades slipped to Cs and Ds.

I honestly don't remember learning anything that year. I remember winning a writing competition and going to NAU to meet a real author (a highlight of my youth), but I don't remember a single thing I learned beyond that. I do, however, remember some of the stupid things I did to avoid having to think about certain subjects. Health was my worst subject. Not because I didn't understand it, but because I thought it was stupid and pointless. I went to extraordinary lengths to avoid thinking about health, including using the bubble sheets for our health quizzes to make fun patterns like zigzags and circles and things. I also remember not wanting to "waste" my time on the subject so rushing through assignments like answering "True, False, True, False, True, False" rather than even reading the questions.

Needless to say, my attitude came out in my grades and the fateful day when I got my first (and only) "F" arrived.

I knew that it was coming and that there wasn't anything I could do about it. So a few days before report cards came out, I asked my mom what she would do if I brought home an "F" on my report card. Her answer surprised me.

"I'll probably cry," she said. "And then... I don't know."

And that is exactly what happened. When I gave her my card, she didn't say anything— much worse than if she'd yelled. She just went into her room and cried for what seemed like a very long time. I felt terrible.

At the time, I really didn't understand why she was crying. After all, it was MY grade and MY fault. What did it have to do with her? Somehow I felt that it was unfair.

On Monday, I finally understood.

When Joey brought home his report card with the failing grade, it made me sick. The thing is, I wasn't upset at him so much as upset at myself. I knew that he bore some of the fault, but I felt like it was more my fault. I felt like I had failed him in some way. It made me feel terrible and, like my mother, I cried.

I suddenly understood what I never could as a child. As parents we care so much about our kids. Right or wrong, we hold ourselves responsible for their success and failure. When they succeed, we are happy. When they fail, we feel it almost more than they do.

I think that the key is that we, as parents, are better equipped to see the long-term effects of their actions. Also, we can see ourselves in them, so we feel it more.

Oddly enough, it made me think of a Simpsons episode. In the episode, Bart does something bad (can't remember what) and Homer punishes him by refusing to let Bart go to the new Itchy & Scratchy movie. It is the first time Homer has ever punished Bart and made it stick. Always before he gave in after Bart put on the miserable act. This time is different because Homer is haunted by the thought that Bart could end up as a criminal or a Supreme Court Justice depending on whether Homer punishes him or not. So, no matter how hard Bart tries to get Homer to change his mind, Homer sticks with his guns.

The episode ends several years later with Homer and Bart—now a Supreme Court Justice thanks to Homer's one moment of parenting—walking along the streets of Springfield. They see that the movie theater is playing the Itchy & Scratchy film. Now that Bart has grown into a great man, they agree to see it together. When Itchy (the mouse) does something mean to Scratchy that, to some degree, mirrors the terrible act that Bart did earlier, Homer comments that "Itchy is a jerk." Bart laughs and puts his arm around his dad's shoulders. "Yes he is," he says.

Okay, not exactly related to Joey's issue, but as a father, I can relate to Homer's dilemma. He felt responsible—COMPLETELY responsible—for how Bart turned out in the future. Bart's future happiness pivoted solely on whether or not Homer could actually punish him and therefore teach him the consequences of bad behavior. 

I think that the fact that  Homer's one moment of parenting really did have the desired impact on his son is both a parent's greatest dream and worst nightmare. We love the idea that we can make such a difference in the lives of our children, but it is terrifying to think that we may screw them up beyond repair.

That was how I felt about Joey. I felt like his failure was actually mine. That I was a bad parent because I hadn't taught him correctly. Whether that was true or not didn't matter. I am his father, he is my responsibility and as a result I will always feel that what he does says just as much about me as it does about him.

It made me understand how my mother felt. I suddenly understood why my "F" caused her to cry. She felt like she had failed—that she hadn't been the mother she should have been.

Today, I can honestly tell her that it wasn't her fault. It was all mine. And I am very sorry I made her feel that way.

I can only hope that we can reach Joey like she reached me. Maybe he'll wind up as a Supreme Court Justice.

As we stumble along...

Media_httpuploadwikim_dajmk
On Monday, Jenna and I went to the Hale Centre Theatre of Orem to see The Drowsy Chaperone. We first saw that play a few years ago during the first national tour (Jonathan Crombiee, the actor who played Gilbert in the Anne of Green Gables movies played the lead role). We loved it and laughed throughout the whole thing, so we were excited to see it again.

The play is about a man, known simply as "The Man in the Chair." He is feeling blue and pondering questions of life and musical theater. To help cheer himself up, he puts on a record ("yes, record") of one of his favorite plays from the 1920s—The Drowsy Chaperone. As he listens, the play comes to life in his apartment, telling an absurdly predictable story about a young woman giving up a life of glamour to tie the knot with a man she barely knows.

The man in the chair narrates and even interacts with the characters as the play builds to its wacky crescendo. Jokes abound, ranging from the outrageous Adolfo, the self-proclaimed "King of Romance," who has the funniest scenes, trying to seduce the bride to the terrible puns by two jovial gangsters disguised as pastry chefs.

Throughout, the play pokes fun at the foibles of theater, especially musicals. It riffs on old-time Broadway prejudice, spit-take sequences, and more and apes dozens of other plays, including a hilarious take on The King and I. It even has well-placed digs at modern Broadway, intermissions, Elton John, and Disney. The result is one of the funniest plays ever staged. But the interesting thing is that, in the middle of a rip-roaringly hilarious time, there is a very powerful--and very serious--message.

The message comes in the middle of the play when the bride is feeling apprehensive about getting married and asks advice from her chaperone, a woman who is perpetually drunk and drowsy (hence the name). In response, the chaperone sings an entirely inappropriate anthem (yes, "anthem") called "As We Stumble Along."

As we stumble along
On life's funny journey,
As we stumble along
Into the blue,
We look here and we look there,
Seeking answers anywhere,
Never sure of where to turn or what to do.

Still we bumble our way
Through life's crazy labyrinth.
Barely knowing left from right
Nor right from wrong,
And the best that we can do
Is hope a blue bird
Will sing his song
As we stumble along.

Later, the man in the chair protests a song that declares that "love is always lovely in the end."

"That's not true!" he says. "Love isn't always lovely in the end. Sometimes there are lawyers."

The audience slowly begins to realize that the man, like so many of us, is frustrated with the difficulties of the world and he uses musicals as a way to escape.

As the play progresses, he gets more and more into it and ignores all disruptions to focus solely on the joy it brings him. He obsesses about a moment where a glitch in the record prevents him from hearing the most important advice the chaperone gives to the bride, which is either "leave while you can" or "live while you can." He points out that is the same choice we have through much of life—leave or live.

Just as the play comes to a triumphant, happy climax, real life intrudes, cutting off the last note in an amusing and frustrating way. The man doesn't know what to do. He thinks about starting over but says, "no, we can't do that, can we?"

He collapses into his chair in despair. There, he returns to the message that makes the play transcend its goofiness. "I know it's not a perfect show," he tells the audience (he's right, it is hilariously bad, but that is on purpose). "But it does what a musical is supposed to do. It takes you to another world. And it gives you a little tune to carry with you in your head for when you're feeling blue."

Softly, he begins to hum and then sing "As We Stumble Along." he is soon joined by the rest of the cast and as the song reaches the end, he opens the door and, squaring his shoulders back, he walks off into the world.

I like that message. It touches on why it is so important to find good, uplifting things in life. There are so many things in life to bring us down, that make us blue. As the economic crisis gets worse and partisan battles increase to the point that we fear blood will be spilled, it is hard to see the good. But good plays, books, music, TV shows, movies and more can help lift us up and make it possible to confront the world with defiance and even joy. It is what stories do--it is why they are important!

Arthur Miller once wrote: "Great drama is great questions or it is nothing but technique. I could not imagine a theater worth my time that didn't want to change the world." I agree. Theater—for that matter, any kind of diversion—should have some kind of redeeming value, or it isn't worth our time and effort. It should try to change the world in some way. Even if it is doing nothing more than lift spirits for a few hours.

That doesn't mean that good theater has to always be fun and light. In fact, deep and darker stories can be just as powerful. One of my favorite movies of all time is Glory, about the first all-black regiment in the Civil War. It isn't a funny film, and often it is uncomfortable to watch. The ending is heart-wrenching and sad, but the movie is amazing because I always walk away from it grateful for those that gave their lives to give me the opportunities I have—those that were willing to give everything to preserve this nation. I walk away a little better and a little stronger and a little more willing to face trials and overcome because it is right.

Another of my favorite movies is The Dark Knight. It is a difficult movie to watch, and it makes you wonder if any good still exists in Gotham and, by extension, the rest of the world. And then comes the end, where the people of Gotham and even the "bad men" mobsters, refuse to blow each other up, even at the cost of their own lives. And you walk away with a newfound hope for humanity, that no matter how dark and depressing things get, we can overcome.

In my mind, that is what great theater--what great popular culture--should do: It should give us a bit of light we can use to hold back the darkness of the world. And hopefully it will give us a little tune to carry with us for when we're feeling blue.

Then we stumble away
Through dawn's blinding sunbeams.
Barely knowing right from left
Nor left from wrong.

But as long as we can hear that little blue bird
There'll be a song
As we stumble along.

Beef Ragu, cheese soufflé...

Media_httpjeffmoulton_hnjai
Every once in a while, I like to experiment for meals. Today, I tried my hand at making an instant Beef Ragu, a kind of tomato and beef stew served over mashed potatoes. The results were pretty good—the kids liked it, anyway. Here is the recipe for anyone who wants to try it. Ingredients
  • 3 cans roast beef (can also make your own roast and use about 3 cups worth, diced). Use the broth from 2 cans but drain the third
  • 1 can diced tomatoes
  • 1 small can tomato paste
  • 1 can sliced carrots
  • 1 can green beans
  • 1 medium onion, sliced
  • 1 green pepper, sliced
  • 3 large garlic cloves, crushed
  • Instant mashed potato mix
Instructions
  1. Mix beef, broth, garlic, onion, and green pepper in a pot (I used a wok, but any pot will work).
  2. Bring mixture to a boil, stirring occasionally.
  3. Add carrots, green beans, tomatoes, and tomato paste. Stir until well mixed.
  4. Sing "Be Our Guest" from Disney's Beauty and the Beast. Put special emphasis on the part about Beef Ragu.
  5. Let mixture cook on medium heat, stirring occasionally while you prepare mashed potatoes according to package instructions.
  6. When the potatoes are finished, serve the beef mixture over them.
Enjoy!

Beware the Ides of March

Media_httpjeffmoulton_ngeam
About a year ago, I blogged about my eyes (link to it here), where I talked about the grieving process I was going through for my particular eye condition. In that post I talked about the eventual likelihood that someday I will need a corneal transplant—that a cornea from a donor would have to be grafted in my eye. Well, that day came sooner than I expected. In fact, it is coming on March 15--the Ides of March. About a month ago, I went to the optometrist to have my eyes checked. He looked at my left eye (which they can't even get a reading on anymore) and said: "Wow! I've never seen... that's pretty bad, like, textbook bad." He referred me to a corneal specialist at the Eye Institute (my previous optometrist referred me to the same person). On Friday, Jenna and I hauled Hayden and Mina to the specialist who told me that all other options have been exhausted. If I want better vision, I need a transplant in my left eye. The thing is that I can still see—mostly. There is a lot of ghosting and lights have very dramatic halos, and I often get headaches that I think are caused by my eyes straining, but I can still see. I'm writing this and can read the words, even though they are pretty small. But what worries me is driving at night, which is getting more and more difficult because the headlights and taillights flare so much that it is hard to see the road, especially when it is wet and has more reflections that flare as well. Also, looking at computer screens is getting harder, which obviously concerns me because it is a big part of my job. As when I wrote my first blog post about this topic, I feel a bit conflicted. It will be great to see better, but the whole thing scares me, and it is still very odd to think of having a part of someone else grafted into my body—or the idea that someone has to die for my eyesight to improve. Last night I talked with my brother, who is an optometrist, about it. We discussed several of the potential complications and things to look out for. We also talked about how this will change my life in the future. My brother said, "Remember that this isn't the end. It is a change—the beginning of a whole new adventure." And maybe that is the best way to think about it: an adventure. But that doesn't make it any less scary.